|
|
 Best Sellers | | Home SMOKE ALARM (First Alert/Jarden SA302CN) | |
|  | |  | | | SMOKE ALARM (First Alert/Jarden SA302CN) | | | | | SKU:
DIB -- 537888 | | Availability:
Out of stock | | | | | | Double System smoke alarm features 2 sensors for maximum protection. Ionization sensor detects fast flaming fires, photoelectronic sensor detects slow smoldering fires. Powered by a 9V battery (included). Repeated beeping warns that battery should be replaced. Also, has a low battery trouble silence feature. Individual test switch for each sensor, loud 85dB alarm. Patented infrared remote control technology. Patent-pending microprocessor for intelligent alarm operations. 10 year limited warranty. UL listed. | | | | | |
|
| | Product Details | | Product Length: | 6.0 inches | | Product Width: | 6.0 inches | | Product Height: | 1.0 inches | | Product Weight: | 0.75 pounds | | Package Length: | 8.2 inches | | Package Width: | 6.4 inches | | Package Height: | 3.1 inches | | Package Weight: | 0.8 pounds | | Average Customer Rating: |  based on 77 reviews |
| |
| | Features | Dual System Smoke Alarmalarm smoke detector ac dc dual system photoelectronc
| |
| | Customer Reviews | Average Customer Review:
Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.
 several false alarms Mar 15, 2010
I bought two of these thinking First Alert was a good brand, even though I had read some bad reviews on here. Each of these alarms had times when they would give false alarms. It was too much to handle so we are stuck with something we can't use and Amazon will not take them back.
2 of 2 found the following review helpful:
Please make it stop!!! Feb 21, 2010
I got a very good deal on this model of smoke detector from a local big box retailer. I wanted at least one dual sensor model in my house so I thought this would be a terriffic buy with the remote control test ability. WRONG! I placed this detector in my bedroom behind and above my bed. When I would watch tv, the remote control would set it off once in a while. It even went off once or twice for not reason at all - AT 3:00 AM!!! The last straw was when I was watching tv in bed before work at 6:00 am and the smoke detector (located behind me) starts screming. I pointed my remote NO WHERE NEAR IT! I proceeded to take it off the wall, angrily smash it into many very small pieces, and ordered the Kiddie dual sensor detector that doesn't have a half baked "test using a remote control" feature. Hopefully that one will work better. WHAT WERE THEY THINKING WHEN THEY DESIGNED THIS THING? I think it was designed to torture prisoners or something. They should have included (as an option on a SEPERATE more expensive model) a special remote control for testing the alarm for people who want that feature. If not, they should label it "for rooms without remote controls usage only."
 Well-Designed Feb 21, 2010
After reading about this being one of the best smoke/fire alarms I purchased and it is well designed, easy to replace battery, easy to install. So far no nuisance alarms either.
Smoke and Fire Alarm Feb 14, 2010
So far so good. No fires. That's probably the only way to test the product. It was purchased according to positive reviews by consumers of the item. The price was right and it was a quick delivery.*****
Quality Product Feb 12, 2010
My existing detectors were over ten years old. It was time to replace. I did some research through a consumer product evaluation company. I am very pleased with the product. It was easy to install , looks good and the battery is very easy to replace. I plan on purchasing more for a another home I have. I do not have anything that produces carbon monoxide so I did not need that feature in a detector.
| |
| |
| |  | |  |
|
Recently Viewed | You may also like ... |
|
|
